|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #21 out of 76
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #134, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #105 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 682 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 46-SFE | 30 | 948:56 | 209/445 | 41/135 | 46/62 | 505 | 31/82/113 | 205 | 32 | 25 | 46 | 196/422 | 28/97 | 75 |
| Avg | | 31:38 | 47.0% | 30.4% | 74.2% | 16.8 | 3.8 | 6.8 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 46.4% | 28.9% | |
| 45-SFE | 53 | 1688:01 | 310/691 | 84/220 | 76/93 | 780 | 81/147/228 | 380 | 66 | 40 | 81 | 308/706 | 46/142 | 151 |
| Avg | 53 | 31:51 | 44.9% | 38.2% | 81.7% | 14.7 | 4.3 | 7.2 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 43.6% | 32.4% | |
| 44-SFE | 40 | 1200:10 | 105/273 | 29/93 | 32/47 | 271 | 50/82/132 | 260 | 45 | 23 | 34 | 223/484 | 45/117 | 121 |
| Avg | 40 | 30:00 | 38.5% | 31.2% | 68.1% | 6.8 | 3.3 | 6.5 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 46.1% | 38.5% | |
| 43-SFE | 53 | 1046:16 | 58/178 | 10/58 | 38/45 | 164 | 52/87/139 | 98 | 30 | 19 | 24 | 157/386 | 32/77 | 99 |
| Avg | 0 | 19:44 | 32.6% | 17.2% | 84.4% | 3.1 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 40.7% | 41.6% | |
| TOTALS | 176 | 4883:23 | 682/1587 | 164/506 | 192/247 | 1720 | 214/398/612 | 943 | 173 | 107 | 185 | 884/1998 | 151/433 | 446 |
| Avg | 93 | 27:45 | 43.0% | 32.4% | 77.7% | 9.8 | 3.5 | 5.4 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 44.2% | 34.9% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-SFE | 5 | 94:46 | 8/16 | 0/4 | 1/1 | 17 | 5/8/13 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 19/60 | 3/21 | 20 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:57 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 3.4 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 31.7% | 14.3% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 94:46 | 8/16 | 0/4 | 1/1 | 17 | 5/8/13 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 19/60 | 3/21 | 20 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:57 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 3.4 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 31.7% | 14.3% | |
|