|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #6 out of 88
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #334, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #65 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 1222 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-JAX | 53 | 1479:19 | 181/427 | 62/192 | 73/102 | 497 | 43/113/156 | 338 | 44 | 5 | 54 | 251/518 | 44/118 | 158 |
| Avg | | 27:55 | 42.4% | 32.3% | 71.6% | 9.4 | 2.9 | 6.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 48.5% | 37.3% | |
| TOTALS | 53 | 1479:19 | 181/427 | 62/192 | 73/102 | 497 | 43/113/156 | 338 | 44 | 5 | 54 | 251/518 | 44/118 | 158 |
| Avg | 0 | 27:55 | 42.4% | 32.3% | 71.6% | 9.4 | 2.9 | 6.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 48.5% | 37.3% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-JAX | 13 | 375:07 | 49/113 | 21/51 | 21/27 | 140 | 13/32/45 | 90 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 82/183 | 25/71 | 44 |
| Avg | | 28:51 | 43.4% | 41.2% | 77.8% | 10.8 | 3.5 | 6.9 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 44.8% | 35.2% | |
| TOTALS | 13 | 375:07 | 49/113 | 21/51 | 21/27 | 140 | 13/32/45 | 90 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 82/183 | 25/71 | 44 |
| Avg | 0 | 28:51 | 43.4% | 41.2% | 77.8% | 10.8 | 3.5 | 6.9 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 44.8% | 35.2% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-JAX | 19 | 535:04 | 72/225 | 25/100 | 33/43 | 202 | 17/50/67 | 96 | 9 | 4 | 45 | 112/226 | 20/58 | 72 |
| Avg | 19 | 28:10 | 32.0% | 25.0% | 76.7% | 10.6 | 3.5 | 5.1 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 49.6% | 34.5% | |
| TOTALS | 19 | 535:04 | 72/225 | 25/100 | 33/43 | 202 | 17/50/67 | 96 | 9 | 4 | 45 | 112/226 | 20/58 | 72 |
| Avg | 19 | 28:10 | 32.0% | 25.0% | 76.7% | 10.6 | 3.5 | 5.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 49.6% | 34.5% | |
|