|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #78 out of 81
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #470, his statistical rank is #211.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 45-CAL | 53 | 1628:16 | 300/596 | 58/137 | 97/131 | 755 | 68/134/202 | 367 | 39 | 22 | 113 | 332/713 | 53/154 | 162 |
| Avg | | 30:43 | 50.3% | 42.3% | 74.0% | 14.2 | 3.8 | 6.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 46.6% | 34.4% | |
| 44-CAL | 53 | 1553:35 | 370/782 | 46/130 | 110/147 | 896 | 72/162/234 | 156 | 45 | 27 | 147 | 338/653 | 40/137 | 160 |
| Avg | 39 | 29:19 | 47.3% | 35.4% | 74.8% | 16.9 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.8 | 51.8% | 29.2% | |
| 43-VAN | 3 | 57:21 | 5/9 | 0/1 | 2/2 | 12 | 4/4/8 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 10/20 | 0/1 | 8 |
| Avg | 0 | 19:07 | 55.6% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 4.0 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 50.0% | 0.0% | |
| 43-CAL | 41 | 621:00 | 87/204 | 4/28 | 32/45 | 210 | 32/66/98 | 56 | 19 | 10 | 32 | 112/259 | 21/49 | 77 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:09 | 42.6% | 14.3% | 71.1% | 5.1 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 43.2% | 42.9% | |
| TOTALS | 150 | 3860:12 | 762/1591 | 108/296 | 241/325 | 1873 | 176/366/542 | 587 | 106 | 60 | 298 | 792/1645 | 114/341 | 407 |
| Avg | 39 | 25:44 | 47.9% | 36.5% | 74.2% | 12.5 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 48.1% | 33.4% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-CAL | 10 | 210:14 | 64/113 | 10/20 | 17/20 | 155 | 14/24/38 | 13 | 12 | 7 | 20 | 50/98 | 8/23 | 21 |
| Avg | 2 | 21:01 | 56.6% | 50.0% | 85.0% | 15.5 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 51.0% | 34.8% | |
| TOTALS | 10 | 210:14 | 64/113 | 10/20 | 17/20 | 155 | 14/24/38 | 13 | 12 | 7 | 20 | 50/98 | 8/23 | 21 |
| Avg | 2 | 21:01 | 56.6% | 50.0% | 85.0% | 15.5 | 3.8 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 51.0% | 34.8% | |
|