|

My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #57 out of 76 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #550, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #530 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-CHI | 3 | 46:44 | 5/19 | 0/3 | 4/6 | 14 | 3/8/11 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7/17 | 0/0 | 4 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:35 | 26.3% | 0.0% | 66.7% | 4.7 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 41.2% | | |
| TOTALS | 3 | 46:44 | 5/19 | 0/3 | 4/6 | 14 | 3/8/11 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 7/17 | 0/0 | 4 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:35 | 26.3% | 0.0% | 66.7% | 4.7 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 41.2% | | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 46-CLA | 30 | 511:24 | 78/170 | 9/28 | 38/45 | 203 | 24/59/83 | 25 | 17 | 20 | 24 | 100/212 | 17/38 | 45 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:03 | 45.9% | 32.1% | 84.4% | 6.8 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 47.2% | 44.7% | |
| 45-CLA | 53 | 1363:33 | 228/518 | 26/68 | 61/77 | 543 | 99/191/290 | 81 | 36 | 37 | 90 | 258/532 | 30/91 | 137 |
| Avg | 33 | 25:44 | 44.0% | 38.2% | 79.2% | 10.2 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 48.5% | 33.0% | |
| 44-CLA | 53 | 1723:47 | 255/612 | 24/80 | 99/116 | 633 | 97/238/335 | 104 | 76 | 75 | 102 | 346/712 | 38/122 | 165 |
| Avg | 53 | 32:31 | 41.7% | 30.0% | 85.3% | 11.9 | 6.3 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 48.6% | 31.1% | |
| 43-CLA | 49 | 743:42 | 121/256 | 12/35 | 43/54 | 297 | 42/84/126 | 46 | 30 | 17 | 53 | 104/234 | 16/49 | 53 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:11 | 47.3% | 34.3% | 79.6% | 6.1 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 44.4% | 32.7% | |
| TOTALS | 185 | 4342:26 | 682/1556 | 71/211 | 241/292 | 1676 | 262/572/834 | 256 | 159 | 149 | 269 | 808/1690 | 101/300 | 400 |
| Avg | 86 | 23:28 | 43.8% | 33.6% | 82.5% | 9.1 | 4.5 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 47.8% | 33.7% | |
|