|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #65 out of 71
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #760, his statistical rank is #488.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 47-NAS | 39 | 589:44 | 107/209 | 16/37 | 68/79 | 298 | 52/105/157 | 22 | 26 | 20 | 38 | 81/184 | 4/36 | 53 |
| Avg | | 15:07 | 51.2% | 43.2% | 86.1% | 7.6 | 4.0 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 44.0% | 11.1% | |
| 46-NAS | 53 | 789:31 | 126/283 | 7/35 | 62/75 | 321 | 74/107/181 | 40 | 26 | 30 | 39 | 114/279 | 11/56 | 61 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:54 | 44.5% | 20.0% | 82.7% | 6.1 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 40.9% | 19.6% | |
| 45-NAS | 53 | 772:53 | 115/270 | 11/47 | 71/87 | 312 | 58/100/158 | 38 | 24 | 23 | 45 | 137/298 | 18/64 | 80 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:35 | 42.6% | 23.4% | 81.6% | 5.9 | 3.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 46.0% | 28.1% | |
| 44-NAS | 53 | 809:31 | 120/292 | 13/51 | 55/69 | 308 | 52/121/173 | 45 | 27 | 28 | 45 | 119/262 | 17/52 | 67 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:16 | 41.1% | 25.5% | 79.7% | 5.8 | 3.3 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 45.4% | 32.7% | |
| TOTALS | 198 | 2961:39 | 468/1054 | 47/170 | 256/310 | 1239 | 236/433/669 | 145 | 103 | 101 | 167 | 451/1023 | 50/208 | 261 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:57 | 44.4% | 27.6% | 82.6% | 6.3 | 3.4 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 44.1% | 24.0% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 45-NAS | 6 | 88:14 | 13/34 | 2/4 | 6/9 | 34 | 4/10/14 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 19/42 | 3/7 | 7 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:42 | 38.2% | 50.0% | 66.7% | 5.7 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 45.2% | 42.9% | |
| TOTALS | 6 | 88:14 | 13/34 | 2/4 | 6/9 | 34 | 4/10/14 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 19/42 | 3/7 | 7 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:42 | 38.2% | 50.0% | 66.7% | 5.7 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 45.2% | 42.9% | |
|