|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #62 out of 81
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #659, his statistical rank is #461.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 45-GB | 49 | 1269:01 | 198/496 | 9/28 | 67/85 | 472 | 98/218/316 | 64 | 41 | 64 | 76 | 180/425 | 24/78 | 71 |
| Avg | | 25:54 | 39.9% | 32.1% | 78.8% | 9.6 | 6.4 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 42.4% | 30.8% | |
| TOTALS | 49 | 1269:01 | 198/496 | 9/28 | 67/85 | 472 | 98/218/316 | 64 | 41 | 64 | 76 | 180/425 | 24/78 | 71 |
| Avg | 0 | 25:54 | 39.9% | 32.1% | 78.8% | 9.6 | 6.4 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 42.4% | 30.8% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 45-GB | 1 | 17:35 | 5/6 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 12 | 1/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3/5 | 0/0 | 1 |
| Avg | | 17:35 | 83.3% | | 100.0% | 12.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 60.0% | | |
| TOTALS | 1 | 17:35 | 5/6 | 0/0 | 2/2 | 12 | 1/0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3/5 | 0/0 | 1 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:35 | 83.3% | | 100.0% | 12.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 60.0% | | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-GB | 53 | 1005:50 | 188/425 | 5/19 | 69/87 | 450 | 84/187/271 | 43 | 32 | 40 | 68 | 146/326 | 22/70 | 64 |
| Avg | 5 | 18:59 | 44.2% | 26.3% | 79.3% | 8.5 | 5.1 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 44.8% | 31.4% | |
| 43-GB | 43 | 1001:04 | 118/337 | 9/51 | 47/68 | 292 | 75/165/240 | 51 | 32 | 62 | 86 | 129/323 | 19/66 | 75 |
| Avg | 21 | 23:17 | 35.0% | 17.6% | 69.1% | 6.8 | 5.6 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 39.9% | 28.8% | |
| TOTALS | 96 | 2006:54 | 306/762 | 14/70 | 116/155 | 742 | 159/352/511 | 94 | 64 | 102 | 154 | 275/649 | 41/136 | 139 |
| Avg | 26 | 20:54 | 40.2% | 20.0% | 74.8% | 7.7 | 5.3 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 42.4% | 30.1% | |
|