|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #40 out of 53
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #503, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #474 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 46-MXC | 36 | 544:14 | 109/216 | 1/8 | 38/49 | 257 | 20/75/95 | 50 | 20 | 9 | 26 | 97/206 | 10/42 | 62 |
| Avg | | 15:07 | 50.5% | 12.5% | 77.6% | 7.1 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 47.1% | 23.8% | |
| 45-MXC | 53 | 976:05 | 134/319 | 14/28 | 47/60 | 329 | 48/108/156 | 120 | 22 | 12 | 53 | 187/380 | 45/107 | 110 |
| Avg | 5 | 18:25 | 42.0% | 50.0% | 78.3% | 6.2 | 2.9 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 49.2% | 42.1% | |
| 44-MXC | 53 | 991:40 | 151/361 | 3/24 | 56/82 | 361 | 52/113/165 | 62 | 27 | 14 | 63 | 150/307 | 14/61 | 103 |
| Avg | 2 | 18:43 | 41.8% | 12.5% | 68.3% | 6.8 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 48.9% | 23.0% | |
| TOTALS | 142 | 2511:59 | 394/896 | 18/60 | 141/191 | 947 | 120/296/416 | 232 | 69 | 35 | 142 | 434/893 | 69/210 | 275 |
| Avg | 7 | 17:41 | 44.0% | 30.0% | 73.8% | 6.7 | 2.9 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 48.6% | 32.9% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 45-MXC | 6 | 92:55 | 12/28 | 0/1 | 5/6 | 29 | 3/11/14 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 17/38 | 6/13 | 11 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:29 | 42.9% | 0.0% | 83.3% | 4.8 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 44.7% | 46.2% | |
| TOTALS | 6 | 92:55 | 12/28 | 0/1 | 5/6 | 29 | 3/11/14 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 17/38 | 6/13 | 11 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:29 | 42.9% | 0.0% | 83.3% | 4.8 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 44.7% | 46.2% | |
|