My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #63 out of 68 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #278, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #126 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-VAN | 15 | 251:44 | 46/89 | 8/14 | 17/24 | 117 | 23/49/72 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 7 | 43/104 | 6/19 | 17 |
Avg | | 16:47 | 51.7% | 57.1% | 70.8% | 7.8 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 41.3% | 31.6% | |
40-VAN | 53 | 802:20 | 140/352 | 21/63 | 62/87 | 363 | 60/107/167 | 58 | 31 | 31 | 33 | 109/250 | 17/52 | 57 |
Avg | 0 | 15:08 | 39.8% | 33.3% | 71.3% | 6.8 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 43.6% | 32.7% | |
39-VAN | 53 | 1755:53 | 314/722 | 13/42 | 59/90 | 700 | 165/278/443 | 78 | 40 | 84 | 88 | 254/611 | 37/131 | 139 |
Avg | 53 | 33:08 | 43.5% | 31.0% | 65.6% | 13.2 | 8.4 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 41.6% | 28.2% | |
38-VAN | 53 | 1745:19 | 292/705 | 16/40 | 84/120 | 684 | 109/202/311 | 99 | 56 | 71 | 100 | 266/622 | 29/120 | 166 |
Avg | 53 | 32:56 | 41.4% | 40.0% | 70.0% | 12.9 | 5.9 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.9 | 42.8% | 24.2% | |
37-VAN | 53 | 852:47 | 119/270 | 7/16 | 50/70 | 295 | 60/143/203 | 34 | 22 | 26 | 45 | 121/268 | 16/46 | 75 |
Avg | 0 | 16:05 | 44.1% | 43.8% | 71.4% | 5.6 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 45.1% | 34.8% | |
36-VAN | 53 | 863:38 | 93/241 | 4/13 | 33/46 | 223 | 71/141/212 | 40 | 33 | 27 | 45 | 124/251 | 17/42 | 58 |
Avg | 0 | 16:18 | 38.6% | 30.8% | 71.7% | 4.2 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 49.4% | 40.5% | |
TOTALS | 280 | 6271:41 | 1004/2379 | 69/188 | 305/437 | 2382 | 488/920/1408 | 327 | 190 | 251 | 318 | 917/2106 | 122/410 | 512 |
Avg | 106 | 22:24 | 42.2% | 36.7% | 69.8% | 8.5 | 5.0 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 43.5% | 29.8% | |
|