My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #58 out of 68 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #378, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #159 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
40-NOR | 2 | 29:26 | 3/20 | 1/6 | 5/6 | 12 | 3/1/4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6/15 | 0/2 | 4 |
Avg | 0 | 14:43 | 15.0% | 16.7% | 83.3% | 6.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 40.0% | 0.0% | |
39-NOR | 52 | 1123:51 | 237/565 | 40/121 | 92/112 | 606 | 47/114/161 | 200 | 30 | 19 | 73 | 168/402 | 38/118 | 95 |
Avg | 33 | 21:37 | 41.9% | 33.1% | 82.1% | 11.7 | 3.1 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 41.8% | 32.2% | |
38-NOR | 53 | 1681:16 | 402/943 | 74/216 | 124/155 | 1002 | 76/148/224 | 315 | 48 | 25 | 95 | 259/619 | 54/155 | 137 |
Avg | 53 | 31:43 | 42.6% | 34.3% | 80.0% | 18.9 | 4.2 | 5.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 41.8% | 34.8% | |
37-NOR | 49 | 1336:17 | 273/694 | 46/160 | 91/118 | 683 | 59/165/224 | 91 | 37 | 25 | 95 | 233/535 | 40/129 | 138 |
Avg | 39 | 27:16 | 39.3% | 28.8% | 77.1% | 13.9 | 4.6 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 43.6% | 31.0% | |
36-NOR | 45 | 756:26 | 130/346 | 20/70 | 76/101 | 356 | 35/81/116 | 93 | 28 | 15 | 51 | 130/296 | 20/65 | 93 |
Avg | 0 | 16:49 | 37.6% | 28.6% | 75.2% | 7.9 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 43.9% | 30.8% | |
TOTALS | 201 | 4927:16 | 1045/2568 | 181/573 | 388/492 | 2659 | 220/509/729 | 701 | 144 | 86 | 319 | 796/1867 | 152/469 | 467 |
Avg | 125 | 24:31 | 40.7% | 31.6% | 78.9% | 13.2 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 42.6% | 32.4% | |
|