|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #25 out of 90
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #326, his statistical rank is #155.
Therefore we believe a salary of 555 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-QUE | 53 | 1811:26 | 361/952 | 100/341 | 137/171 | 959 | 142/290/432 | 72 | 59 | 87 | 70 | 252/607 | 43/117 | 141 |
| Avg | | 34:11 | 37.9% | 29.3% | 80.1% | 18.1 | 8.2 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 41.5% | 36.8% | |
| 40-QUE | 53 | 1802:01 | 261/696 | 41/153 | 95/133 | 658 | 164/296/460 | 61 | 62 | 60 | 59 | 244/588 | 38/122 | 130 |
| Avg | 53 | 34:00 | 37.5% | 26.8% | 71.4% | 12.4 | 8.7 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 41.5% | 31.1% | |
| 39-QUE | 53 | 1744:45 | 314/769 | 34/111 | 83/105 | 745 | 129/238/367 | 96 | 66 | 79 | 53 | 293/690 | 56/143 | 154 |
| Avg | 53 | 32:55 | 40.8% | 30.6% | 79.0% | 14.1 | 6.9 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 42.5% | 39.2% | |
| 38-QUE | 53 | 830:29 | 149/375 | 25/71 | 81/113 | 404 | 49/102/151 | 42 | 25 | 33 | 32 | 130/312 | 24/60 | 79 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:40 | 39.7% | 35.2% | 71.7% | 7.6 | 2.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 41.7% | 40.0% | |
| TOTALS | 212 | 6188:41 | 1085/2792 | 200/676 | 396/522 | 2766 | 484/926/1410 | 271 | 212 | 259 | 214 | 919/2197 | 161/442 | 504 |
| Avg | 106 | 29:12 | 38.9% | 29.6% | 75.9% | 13.0 | 6.7 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 41.8% | 36.4% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 38-QUE | 6 | 91:54 | 13/49 | 3/8 | 8/8 | 37 | 4/5/9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 13/44 | 2/11 | 8 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:19 | 26.5% | 37.5% | 100.0% | 6.2 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 29.5% | 18.2% | |
| TOTALS | 6 | 91:54 | 13/49 | 3/8 | 8/8 | 37 | 4/5/9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 13/44 | 2/11 | 8 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:19 | 26.5% | 37.5% | 100.0% | 6.2 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 29.5% | 18.2% | |
|