|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #74 out of 90
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #661, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #166 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-RIO | 53 | 875:45 | 166/332 | 16/44 | 54/75 | 402 | 47/90/137 | 76 | 34 | 23 | 23 | 162/362 | 39/105 | 84 |
| Avg | | 16:31 | 50.0% | 36.4% | 72.0% | 7.6 | 2.6 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 44.8% | 37.1% | |
| 40-RIO | 53 | 822:10 | 131/292 | 11/40 | 70/81 | 343 | 38/100/138 | 41 | 36 | 31 | 19 | 135/314 | 25/73 | 63 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:31 | 44.9% | 27.5% | 86.4% | 6.5 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 43.0% | 34.2% | |
| 39-RIO | 53 | 818:30 | 109/300 | 18/56 | 75/86 | 311 | 48/98/146 | 51 | 29 | 16 | 36 | 126/303 | 15/53 | 79 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:27 | 36.3% | 32.1% | 87.2% | 5.9 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 41.6% | 28.3% | |
| 38-RIO | 2 | 28:44 | 4/8 | 0/1 | 4/4 | 12 | 1/1/2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4/7 | 1/1 | 5 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:22 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% | 6.0 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 57.1% | 100.0% | |
| TOTALS | 161 | 2545:09 | 410/932 | 45/141 | 203/246 | 1068 | 134/289/423 | 173 | 101 | 71 | 78 | 427/986 | 80/232 | 231 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:49 | 44.0% | 31.9% | 82.5% | 6.6 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 43.3% | 34.5% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 40-RIO | 5 | 78:16 | 6/23 | 0/3 | 10/12 | 22 | 6/5/11 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 19/44 | 2/13 | 13 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:39 | 26.1% | 0.0% | 83.3% | 4.4 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 43.2% | 15.4% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 78:16 | 6/23 | 0/3 | 10/12 | 22 | 6/5/11 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 19/44 | 2/13 | 13 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:39 | 26.1% | 0.0% | 83.3% | 4.4 | 2.2 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 43.2% | 15.4% | |
|