
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #80 out of 85 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #764, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #245 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
42-HAR | 3 | 88:19 | 20/47 | 5/11 | 5/6 | 50 | 2/5/7 | 21 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10/25 | 1/2 | 4 |
Avg | | 29:26 | 42.6% | 45.5% | 83.3% | 16.7 | 2.3 | 7.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 40.0% | 50.0% | |
41-HAR | 6 | 75:56 | 22/48 | 4/6 | 10/15 | 58 | 1/1/2 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 19/35 | 3/7 | 8 |
Avg | 0 | 12:39 | 45.8% | 66.7% | 66.7% | 9.7 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 54.3% | 42.9% | |
38-HAR | 45 | 867:23 | 64/169 | 7/33 | 21/37 | 156 | 20/73/93 | 171 | 16 | 2 | 15 | 129/306 | 24/70 | 77 |
Avg | 0 | 19:17 | 37.9% | 21.2% | 56.8% | 3.5 | 2.1 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 42.2% | 34.3% | |
TOTALS | 54 | 1031:38 | 106/264 | 16/50 | 36/58 | 264 | 23/79/102 | 201 | 23 | 5 | 21 | 158/366 | 28/79 | 89 |
Avg | 0 | 19:06 | 40.2% | 32.0% | 62.1% | 4.9 | 1.9 | 3.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 43.2% | 35.4% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-HAR | 17 | 215:18 | 44/109 | 5/21 | 19/24 | 112 | 9/15/24 | 36 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 42/81 | 5/13 | 22 |
Avg | 0 | 12:40 | 40.4% | 23.8% | 79.2% | 6.6 | 1.4 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 51.9% | 38.5% | |
40-HAR | 1 | 12:26 | 4/4 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 8 | 0/0/0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3/3 | 0/0 | 0 |
Avg | 0 | 12:26 | 100.0% | | | 8.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0% | | |
TOTALS | 18 | 227:44 | 48/113 | 5/21 | 19/24 | 120 | 9/15/24 | 39 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 45/84 | 5/13 | 22 |
Avg | 0 | 12:39 | 42.5% | 23.8% | 79.2% | 6.7 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 53.6% | 38.5% | |
|