|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #46 out of 78
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #685, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #550 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-DET | 25 | 383:46 | 50/115 | 23/51 | 26/30 | 149 | 16/40/56 | 23 | 13 | 12 | 6 | 56/142 | 8/27 | 34 |
| Avg | | 15:21 | 43.5% | 45.1% | 86.7% | 6.0 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 39.4% | 29.6% | |
| 42-DET | 2 | 28:55 | 3/8 | 3/6 | 2/2 | 11 | 1/0/1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6/14 | 2/6 | 2 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:28 | 37.5% | 50.0% | 100.0% | 5.5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 42.9% | 33.3% | |
| 41-DET | 26 | 421:13 | 45/128 | 21/64 | 38/49 | 149 | 22/34/56 | 93 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 83/185 | 14/40 | 35 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:12 | 35.2% | 32.8% | 77.6% | 5.7 | 2.2 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 44.9% | 35.0% | |
| 40-DET | 53 | 841:03 | 98/273 | 39/123 | 71/84 | 306 | 40/62/102 | 139 | 20 | 12 | 13 | 123/315 | 21/84 | 84 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:52 | 35.9% | 31.7% | 84.5% | 5.8 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 39.0% | 25.0% | |
| 39-DET | 47 | 859:44 | 132/350 | 54/173 | 64/85 | 382 | 34/53/87 | 145 | 25 | 14 | 18 | 138/321 | 16/63 | 62 |
| Avg | 6 | 18:18 | 37.7% | 31.2% | 75.3% | 8.1 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 43.0% | 25.4% | |
| 38-DET | 35 | 730:11 | 121/312 | 37/102 | 57/69 | 336 | 20/51/71 | 133 | 14 | 6 | 35 | 124/267 | 15/53 | 86 |
| Avg | 12 | 20:52 | 38.8% | 36.3% | 82.6% | 9.6 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 46.4% | 28.3% | |
| TOTALS | 188 | 3264:52 | 449/1186 | 177/519 | 258/319 | 1333 | 133/240/373 | 539 | 90 | 56 | 77 | 530/1244 | 76/273 | 303 |
| Avg | 18 | 17:22 | 37.9% | 34.1% | 80.9% | 7.1 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 42.6% | 27.8% | |
|