My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #46 out of 90 While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #611, his statistical rank is #352. Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
41-DET | 53 | 1749:56 | 224/623 | 83/297 | 60/78 | 591 | 205/386/591 | 69 | 43 | 62 | 56 | 204/451 | 16/64 | 129 |
Avg | | 33:01 | 36.0% | 27.9% | 76.9% | 11.2 | 11.2 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 45.2% | 25.0% | |
40-DET | 38 | 1039:10 | 152/453 | 54/203 | 55/73 | 413 | 118/210/328 | 38 | 21 | 33 | 43 | 140/289 | 17/42 | 89 |
Avg | 27 | 27:21 | 33.6% | 26.6% | 75.3% | 10.9 | 8.6 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 48.4% | 40.5% | |
39-DET | 53 | 1625:49 | 202/583 | 77/270 | 67/94 | 548 | 187/323/510 | 63 | 35 | 59 | 68 | 243/504 | 28/86 | 140 |
Avg | 43 | 30:41 | 34.6% | 28.5% | 71.3% | 10.3 | 9.6 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 48.2% | 32.6% | |
38-DET | 49 | 1650:22 | 136/380 | 52/176 | 53/69 | 377 | 169/307/476 | 88 | 31 | 46 | 50 | 232/443 | 29/76 | 140 |
Avg | 49 | 33:41 | 35.8% | 29.5% | 76.8% | 7.7 | 9.7 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 52.4% | 38.2% | |
TOTALS | 193 | 6065:17 | 714/2039 | 266/946 | 235/314 | 1929 | 679/1226/1905 | 258 | 130 | 200 | 217 | 819/1687 | 90/268 | 498 |
Avg | 119 | 31:26 | 35.0% | 28.1% | 74.8% | 10.0 | 9.9 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 48.5% | 33.6% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
38-DET | 7 | 240:42 | 7/28 | 3/15 | 0/0 | 17 | 21/58/79 | 13 | 9 | 12 | 6 | 37/74 | 1/4 | 23 |
Avg | 7 | 34:23 | 25.0% | 20.0% | | 2.4 | 11.3 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
TOTALS | 7 | 240:42 | 7/28 | 3/15 | 0/0 | 17 | 21/58/79 | 13 | 9 | 12 | 6 | 37/74 | 1/4 | 23 |
Avg | 7 | 34:23 | 25.0% | 20.0% | | 2.4 | 11.3 | 1.9 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 50.0% | 25.0% | |
|