|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #54 out of 90
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #732, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #376 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-EDM | 53 | 863:34 | 106/262 | 17/44 | 60/80 | 289 | 93/177/270 | 18 | 15 | 37 | 28 | 103/258 | 12/38 | 64 |
| Avg | | 16:18 | 40.5% | 38.6% | 75.0% | 5.5 | 5.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 39.9% | 31.6% | |
| 40-EDM | 53 | 896:26 | 127/294 | 10/44 | 57/81 | 321 | 79/205/284 | 37 | 21 | 38 | 45 | 117/278 | 19/42 | 66 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:55 | 43.2% | 22.7% | 70.4% | 6.1 | 5.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 42.1% | 45.2% | |
| 39-EDM | 53 | 868:06 | 108/294 | 10/45 | 53/87 | 279 | 77/174/251 | 29 | 24 | 46 | 50 | 126/297 | 16/46 | 83 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:23 | 36.7% | 22.2% | 60.9% | 5.3 | 4.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 42.4% | 34.8% | |
| 38-EDM | 52 | 980:58 | 130/372 | 9/49 | 38/56 | 307 | 98/217/315 | 46 | 30 | 48 | 64 | 124/277 | 17/46 | 83 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:52 | 34.9% | 18.4% | 67.9% | 5.9 | 6.1 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 44.8% | 37.0% | |
| TOTALS | 211 | 3609:04 | 471/1222 | 46/182 | 208/304 | 1196 | 347/773/1120 | 130 | 90 | 169 | 187 | 470/1110 | 64/172 | 296 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:06 | 38.5% | 25.3% | 68.4% | 5.7 | 5.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 42.3% | 37.2% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 40-EDM | 5 | 83:39 | 7/30 | 1/5 | 0/0 | 15 | 4/17/21 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 12/29 | 1/4 | 3 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:44 | 23.3% | 20.0% | | 3.0 | 4.2 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 41.4% | 25.0% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 83:39 | 7/30 | 1/5 | 0/0 | 15 | 4/17/21 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 12/29 | 1/4 | 3 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:44 | 23.3% | 20.0% | | 3.0 | 4.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 41.4% | 25.0% | |
|