|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #60 out of 90
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #413, his statistical rank is #196.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-DET | 51 | 1613:19 | 299/775 | 111/349 | 95/120 | 804 | 59/113/172 | 252 | 39 | 17 | 46 | 341/719 | 71/175 | 146 |
| Avg | | 31:38 | 38.6% | 31.8% | 79.2% | 15.8 | 3.4 | 4.9 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 47.4% | 40.6% | |
| 40-DET | 53 | 1702:57 | 281/668 | 111/315 | 119/156 | 792 | 59/116/175 | 305 | 42 | 15 | 44 | 275/621 | 44/149 | 174 |
| Avg | 53 | 32:08 | 42.1% | 35.2% | 76.3% | 14.9 | 3.3 | 5.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 44.3% | 29.5% | |
| 39-DET | 49 | 1537:53 | 286/758 | 112/360 | 83/114 | 767 | 57/113/170 | 265 | 38 | 5 | 59 | 226/539 | 33/109 | 133 |
| Avg | 46 | 31:23 | 37.7% | 31.1% | 72.8% | 15.7 | 3.5 | 5.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 41.9% | 30.3% | |
| 38-DET | 25 | 358:28 | 50/134 | 17/60 | 25/33 | 142 | 10/27/37 | 70 | 11 | 2 | 15 | 51/114 | 6/25 | 24 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:20 | 37.3% | 28.3% | 75.8% | 5.7 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 44.7% | 24.0% | |
| TOTALS | 178 | 5212:37 | 916/2335 | 351/1084 | 322/423 | 2505 | 185/369/554 | 892 | 130 | 39 | 164 | 893/1993 | 154/458 | 477 |
| Avg | 99 | 29:17 | 39.2% | 32.4% | 76.1% | 14.1 | 3.1 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 44.8% | 33.6% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 38-DET | 13 | 177:48 | 17/49 | 6/23 | 5/5 | 45 | 4/11/15 | 39 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 19/55 | 0/8 | 24 |
| Avg | 0 | 13:41 | 34.7% | 26.1% | 100.0% | 3.5 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 34.5% | 0.0% | |
| TOTALS | 13 | 177:48 | 17/49 | 6/23 | 5/5 | 45 | 4/11/15 | 39 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 19/55 | 0/8 | 24 |
| Avg | 0 | 13:41 | 34.7% | 26.1% | 100.0% | 3.5 | 1.2 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 34.5% | 0.0% | |
|