|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #41 out of 64
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #462, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #347 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-SJU | 31 | 554:21 | 117/233 | 4/16 | 43/55 | 281 | 34/90/124 | 25 | 20 | 25 | 27 | 77/183 | 14/34 | 41 |
| Avg | | 17:53 | 50.2% | 25.0% | 78.2% | 9.1 | 4.0 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 42.1% | 41.2% | |
| 43-SJU | 53 | 931:19 | 204/360 | 13/19 | 63/88 | 484 | 70/149/219 | 59 | 32 | 31 | 61 | 136/308 | 28/71 | 69 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:34 | 56.7% | 68.4% | 71.6% | 9.1 | 4.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 44.2% | 39.4% | |
| 42-SJU | 53 | 1690:52 | 289/634 | 14/39 | 81/115 | 673 | 153/227/380 | 81 | 49 | 65 | 97 | 318/628 | 41/112 | 141 |
| Avg | 53 | 31:54 | 45.6% | 35.9% | 70.4% | 12.7 | 7.2 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 50.6% | 36.6% | |
| 41-SJU | 53 | 871:00 | 111/303 | 2/19 | 72/102 | 296 | 57/126/183 | 54 | 17 | 29 | 55 | 127/289 | 28/76 | 77 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:26 | 36.6% | 10.5% | 70.6% | 5.6 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 43.9% | 36.8% | |
| 40-NOR | 53 | 842:48 | 55/131 | 9/21 | 35/47 | 154 | 63/107/170 | 44 | 25 | 22 | 36 | 163/310 | 32/70 | 64 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:54 | 42.0% | 42.9% | 74.5% | 2.9 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 52.6% | 45.7% | |
| 39-NOR | 33 | 585:57 | 46/130 | 2/13 | 5/13 | 99 | 55/104/159 | 25 | 12 | 18 | 24 | 95/180 | 8/30 | 53 |
| Avg | 8 | 17:45 | 35.4% | 15.4% | 38.5% | 3.0 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 52.8% | 26.7% | |
| TOTALS | 276 | 5476:17 | 822/1791 | 44/127 | 299/420 | 1987 | 432/803/1235 | 288 | 155 | 190 | 300 | 916/1898 | 151/393 | 445 |
| Avg | 61 | 19:50 | 45.9% | 34.6% | 71.2% | 7.2 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.1 | 48.3% | 38.4% | |
|