|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #61 out of 77
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #611, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #177 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-JAX | 53 | 1005:21 | 195/437 | 27/78 | 96/123 | 513 | 75/98/173 | 68 | 34 | 32 | 23 | 188/412 | 45/119 | 91 |
| Avg | | 18:58 | 44.6% | 34.6% | 78.0% | 9.7 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 45.6% | 37.8% | |
| 40-JAX | 53 | 1025:24 | 173/435 | 30/79 | 73/105 | 449 | 76/145/221 | 51 | 31 | 29 | 33 | 141/335 | 24/73 | 93 |
| Avg | 0 | 19:21 | 39.8% | 38.0% | 69.5% | 8.5 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 42.1% | 32.9% | |
| 39-JAX | 49 | 853:20 | 122/334 | 5/44 | 68/91 | 317 | 53/86/139 | 58 | 31 | 42 | 26 | 154/357 | 24/69 | 91 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:25 | 36.5% | 11.4% | 74.7% | 6.5 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 43.1% | 34.8% | |
| TOTALS | 155 | 2884:05 | 490/1206 | 62/201 | 237/319 | 1279 | 204/329/533 | 177 | 96 | 103 | 82 | 483/1104 | 93/261 | 275 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:36 | 40.6% | 30.8% | 74.3% | 8.3 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 43.8% | 35.6% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 40-JAX | 5 | 93:51 | 18/42 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 45 | 6/7/13 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 17/40 | 6/15 | 10 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:46 | 42.9% | 60.0% | 60.0% | 9.0 | 2.6 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 42.5% | 40.0% | |
| 39-JAX | 5 | 85:31 | 17/40 | 2/5 | 9/10 | 45 | 7/16/23 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7/20 | 2/11 | 8 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:06 | 42.5% | 40.0% | 90.0% | 9.0 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 35.0% | 18.2% | |
| TOTALS | 10 | 179:22 | 35/82 | 5/10 | 15/20 | 90 | 13/23/36 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 24/60 | 8/26 | 18 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:56 | 42.7% | 50.0% | 75.0% | 9.0 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 40.0% | 30.8% | |
|