|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #44 out of 53
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #531, his statistical rank is #256.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-JAX | 49 | 1427:13 | 219/596 | 91/279 | 106/137 | 635 | 81/174/255 | 69 | 45 | 52 | 42 | 224/514 | 36/107 | 127 |
| Avg | | 29:08 | 36.7% | 32.6% | 77.4% | 13.0 | 5.2 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 43.6% | 33.6% | |
| 42-JAX | 53 | 1016:04 | 215/452 | 40/99 | 66/103 | 536 | 58/124/182 | 46 | 40 | 34 | 32 | 175/388 | 35/77 | 86 |
| Avg | 0 | 19:10 | 47.6% | 40.4% | 64.1% | 10.1 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 45.1% | 45.5% | |
| 41-JAX | 25 | 490:32 | 35/91 | 9/23 | 23/32 | 102 | 33/64/97 | 23 | 16 | 19 | 8 | 69/159 | 16/39 | 37 |
| Avg | 0 | 19:37 | 38.5% | 39.1% | 71.9% | 4.1 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 43.4% | 41.0% | |
| 40-OTT | 51 | 614:21 | 58/177 | 10/37 | 19/28 | 145 | 51/83/134 | 40 | 19 | 18 | 8 | 95/194 | 20/57 | 56 |
| Avg | 1 | 12:03 | 32.8% | 27.0% | 67.9% | 2.8 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 49.0% | 35.1% | |
| TOTALS | 178 | 3548:10 | 527/1316 | 150/438 | 214/300 | 1418 | 223/445/668 | 178 | 120 | 123 | 90 | 563/1255 | 107/280 | 306 |
| Avg | 1 | 19:56 | 40.0% | 34.2% | 71.3% | 8.0 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 44.9% | 38.2% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 42-JAX | 5 | 90:45 | 14/44 | 1/12 | 9/11 | 38 | 4/11/15 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 16/30 | 0/1 | 2 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:09 | 31.8% | 8.3% | 81.8% | 7.6 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 53.3% | 0.0% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 90:45 | 14/44 | 1/12 | 9/11 | 38 | 4/11/15 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 16/30 | 0/1 | 2 |
| Avg | 0 | 18:09 | 31.8% | 8.3% | 81.8% | 7.6 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 53.3% | 0.0% | |
|