|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #43 out of 53
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #402, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #278 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-SJU | 35 | 1034:46 | 166/360 | 10/25 | 46/57 | 388 | 51/154/205 | 47 | 36 | 42 | 52 | 122/293 | 8/45 | 74 |
| Avg | | 29:34 | 46.1% | 40.0% | 80.7% | 11.1 | 5.9 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 41.6% | 17.8% | |
| 42-SJU | 46 | 1225:55 | 159/394 | 11/35 | 61/86 | 390 | 88/162/250 | 103 | 49 | 33 | 60 | 238/529 | 42/140 | 121 |
| Avg | 28 | 26:39 | 40.4% | 31.4% | 70.9% | 8.5 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 45.0% | 30.0% | |
| 41-CAR | 53 | 858:36 | 77/227 | 4/14 | 42/51 | 200 | 51/133/184 | 60 | 20 | 24 | 42 | 108/291 | 12/65 | 71 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:12 | 33.9% | 28.6% | 82.4% | 3.8 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 37.1% | 18.5% | |
| 40-CAR | 51 | 851:47 | 90/254 | 3/13 | 37/52 | 220 | 40/109/149 | 51 | 24 | 20 | 36 | 109/269 | 19/63 | 70 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:42 | 35.4% | 23.1% | 71.2% | 4.3 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 40.5% | 30.2% | |
| TOTALS | 185 | 3971:04 | 492/1235 | 28/87 | 186/246 | 1198 | 230/558/788 | 261 | 129 | 119 | 190 | 577/1382 | 81/313 | 336 |
| Avg | 28 | 21:28 | 39.8% | 32.2% | 75.6% | 6.5 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 41.8% | 25.9% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-CAR | 12 | 204:50 | 17/40 | 2/4 | 4/5 | 40 | 12/42/54 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 31/63 | 7/23 | 18 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:04 | 42.5% | 50.0% | 80.0% | 3.3 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 49.2% | 30.4% | |
| TOTALS | 12 | 204:50 | 17/40 | 2/4 | 4/5 | 40 | 12/42/54 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 31/63 | 7/23 | 18 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:04 | 42.5% | 50.0% | 80.0% | 3.3 | 4.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 49.2% | 30.4% | |
|