|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #42 out of 69
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #555, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #473 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-BUF | 53 | 1655:45 | 177/435 | 15/58 | 64/83 | 433 | 97/206/303 | 107 | 33 | 49 | 38 | 302/668 | 52/151 | 151 |
| Avg | | 31:14 | 40.7% | 25.9% | 77.1% | 8.2 | 5.7 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 45.2% | 34.4% | |
| TOTALS | 53 | 1655:45 | 177/435 | 15/58 | 64/83 | 433 | 97/206/303 | 107 | 33 | 49 | 38 | 302/668 | 52/151 | 151 |
| Avg | 0 | 31:14 | 40.7% | 25.9% | 77.1% | 8.2 | 5.7 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 45.2% | 34.4% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-BUF | 5 | 79:33 | 13/27 | 0/1 | 6/11 | 32 | 6/11/17 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 7/24 | 2/5 | 7 |
| Avg | | 15:55 | 48.1% | 0.0% | 54.5% | 6.4 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 29.2% | 40.0% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 79:33 | 13/27 | 0/1 | 6/11 | 32 | 6/11/17 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 7/24 | 2/5 | 7 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:55 | 48.1% | 0.0% | 54.5% | 6.4 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 29.2% | 40.0% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 40-BUF | 53 | 1003:29 | 111/260 | 12/37 | 52/70 | 286 | 67/138/205 | 77 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 160/335 | 18/61 | 84 |
| Avg | 12 | 18:56 | 42.7% | 32.4% | 74.3% | 5.4 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 47.8% | 29.5% | |
| TOTALS | 53 | 1003:29 | 111/260 | 12/37 | 52/70 | 286 | 67/138/205 | 77 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 160/335 | 18/61 | 84 |
| Avg | 12 | 18:56 | 42.7% | 32.4% | 74.3% | 5.4 | 3.9 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 47.8% | 29.5% | |
|