|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #42 out of 56
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #299, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #285 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-BIR | 39 | 1123:40 | 185/437 | 20/67 | 50/64 | 440 | 102/154/256 | 56 | 51 | 53 | 44 | 176/419 | 34/91 | 88 |
| Avg | | 28:49 | 42.3% | 29.9% | 78.1% | 11.3 | 6.6 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 42.0% | 37.4% | |
| 42-RIO | 53 | 797:07 | 93/256 | 16/46 | 51/66 | 253 | 79/173/252 | 38 | 20 | 43 | 36 | 108/248 | 20/47 | 62 |
| Avg | 0 | 15:02 | 36.3% | 34.8% | 77.3% | 4.8 | 4.8 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 43.5% | 42.6% | |
| 41-RIO | 53 | 784:18 | 88/267 | 14/42 | 45/61 | 235 | 81/144/225 | 37 | 20 | 35 | 39 | 99/239 | 16/48 | 60 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:48 | 33.0% | 33.3% | 73.8% | 4.4 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 41.4% | 33.3% | |
| 40-RIO | 53 | 1468:49 | 187/518 | 25/96 | 97/127 | 496 | 128/327/455 | 61 | 41 | 58 | 68 | 187/426 | 21/70 | 104 |
| Avg | 0 | 27:43 | 36.1% | 26.0% | 76.4% | 9.4 | 8.6 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 43.9% | 30.0% | |
| TOTALS | 198 | 4173:54 | 553/1478 | 75/251 | 243/318 | 1424 | 390/798/1188 | 192 | 132 | 189 | 187 | 570/1332 | 91/256 | 314 |
| Avg | 0 | 21:05 | 37.4% | 29.9% | 76.4% | 7.2 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 42.8% | 35.5% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 40-RIO | 5 | 131:58 | 12/51 | 2/5 | 9/11 | 35 | 16/29/45 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 23/43 | 3/5 | 11 |
| Avg | 0 | 26:24 | 23.5% | 40.0% | 81.8% | 7.0 | 9.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 53.5% | 60.0% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 131:58 | 12/51 | 2/5 | 9/11 | 35 | 16/29/45 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 23/43 | 3/5 | 11 |
| Avg | 0 | 26:24 | 23.5% | 40.0% | 81.8% | 7.0 | 9.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 53.5% | 60.0% | |
|