
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #9 out of 55 While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #367, his statistical rank is #88. Therefore we believe a salary of 912 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
44-SFE | 31 | 996:47 | 254/520 | 31/95 | 65/79 | 604 | 102/222/324 | 39 | 37 | 46 | 72 | 142/310 | 15/42 | 62 |
Avg | | 32:09 | 48.8% | 32.6% | 82.3% | 19.5 | 10.5 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 2.3 | 45.8% | 35.7% | |
43-SFE | 49 | 1554:28 | 300/644 | 40/119 | 100/119 | 740 | 160/341/501 | 67 | 59 | 77 | 113 | 211/511 | 28/117 | 107 |
Avg | 48 | 31:43 | 46.6% | 33.6% | 84.0% | 15.1 | 10.2 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 41.3% | 23.9% | |
42-SFE | 53 | 1680:47 | 176/414 | 20/66 | 57/76 | 429 | 163/359/522 | 83 | 48 | 81 | 100 | 215/524 | 34/130 | 106 |
Avg | 53 | 31:43 | 42.5% | 30.3% | 75.0% | 8.1 | 9.8 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.9 | 41.0% | 26.2% | |
41-SFE | 53 | 1586:52 | 92/241 | 11/33 | 24/33 | 219 | 160/353/513 | 84 | 27 | 60 | 38 | 165/432 | 24/81 | 97 |
Avg | 53 | 29:56 | 38.2% | 33.3% | 72.7% | 4.1 | 9.7 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 38.2% | 29.6% | |
TOTALS | 186 | 5818:54 | 822/1819 | 102/313 | 246/307 | 1992 | 585/1275/1860 | 273 | 171 | 264 | 323 | 733/1777 | 101/370 | 372 |
Avg | 154 | 31:17 | 45.2% | 32.6% | 80.1% | 10.7 | 10.0 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 41.2% | 27.3% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
43-SFE | 5 | 146:58 | 25/57 | 3/13 | 2/3 | 55 | 11/31/42 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 11/31 | 2/4 | 7 |
Avg | 5 | 29:24 | 43.9% | 23.1% | 66.7% | 11.0 | 8.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 35.5% | 50.0% | |
TOTALS | 5 | 146:58 | 25/57 | 3/13 | 2/3 | 55 | 11/31/42 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 11/31 | 2/4 | 7 |
Avg | 5 | 29:24 | 43.9% | 23.1% | 66.7% | 11.0 | 8.4 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 35.5% | 50.0% | |
|