
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #8 out of 55 While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #238, his statistical rank is #83. Therefore we believe a salary of 979 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
44-DET | 30 | 949:22 | 294/571 | 39/113 | 78/94 | 705 | 54/101/155 | 71 | 39 | 24 | 61 | 203/434 | 35/101 | 104 |
Avg | | 31:39 | 51.5% | 34.5% | 83.0% | 23.5 | 5.2 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 46.8% | 34.7% | |
43-DET | 39 | 1259:52 | 310/682 | 40/155 | 77/97 | 737 | 70/125/195 | 91 | 41 | 29 | 90 | 212/485 | 32/112 | 119 |
Avg | 39 | 32:18 | 45.5% | 25.8% | 79.4% | 18.9 | 5.0 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 43.7% | 28.6% | |
42-DET | 53 | 1744:47 | 221/562 | 94/285 | 82/99 | 618 | 96/190/286 | 150 | 63 | 28 | 101 | 355/694 | 68/179 | 177 |
Avg | 53 | 32:55 | 39.3% | 33.0% | 82.8% | 11.7 | 5.4 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 51.2% | 38.0% | |
41-DET | 53 | 1373:53 | 177/461 | 79/220 | 77/96 | 510 | 69/132/201 | 112 | 33 | 30 | 95 | 260/558 | 44/128 | 164 |
Avg | 35 | 25:55 | 38.4% | 35.9% | 80.2% | 9.6 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 46.6% | 34.4% | |
TOTALS | 175 | 5327:54 | 1002/2276 | 252/773 | 314/386 | 2570 | 289/548/837 | 424 | 176 | 111 | 347 | 1030/2171 | 179/520 | 564 |
Avg | 127 | 30:27 | 44.0% | 32.6% | 81.3% | 14.7 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 47.4% | 34.4% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
43-DET | 9 | 294:12 | 67/138 | 9/23 | 23/26 | 166 | 10/23/33 | 31 | 13 | 3 | 19 | 71/145 | 19/55 | 28 |
Avg | 9 | 32:41 | 48.6% | 39.1% | 88.5% | 18.4 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 2.1 | 49.0% | 34.5% | |
TOTALS | 9 | 294:12 | 67/138 | 9/23 | 23/26 | 166 | 10/23/33 | 31 | 13 | 3 | 19 | 71/145 | 19/55 | 28 |
Avg | 9 | 32:41 | 48.6% | 39.1% | 88.5% | 18.4 | 3.7 | 3.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 49.0% | 34.5% | |
|