|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #3 out of 55
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #249, his statistical rank is #66.
Therefore we believe a salary of 1209 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-DET | 31 | 1029:24 | 270/609 | 110/299 | 61/75 | 711 | 51/63/114 | 198 | 36 | 25 | 64 | 187/428 | 38/115 | 73 |
| Avg | | 33:12 | 44.3% | 36.8% | 81.3% | 22.9 | 3.7 | 6.4 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 43.7% | 33.0% | |
| 43-DET | 52 | 1711:40 | 378/905 | 154/430 | 109/134 | 1019 | 74/125/199 | 286 | 61 | 37 | 96 | 338/751 | 56/181 | 138 |
| Avg | 52 | 32:55 | 41.8% | 35.8% | 81.3% | 19.6 | 3.8 | 5.5 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 45.0% | 30.9% | |
| 42-DET | 51 | 1679:44 | 217/539 | 80/256 | 82/98 | 596 | 62/117/179 | 352 | 55 | 25 | 74 | 295/687 | 70/193 | 160 |
| Avg | 51 | 32:56 | 40.3% | 31.3% | 83.7% | 11.7 | 3.5 | 6.9 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 42.9% | 36.3% | |
| 41-DET | 30 | 538:52 | 73/200 | 26/86 | 26/36 | 198 | 18/47/65 | 95 | 17 | 5 | 34 | 90/206 | 20/58 | 56 |
| Avg | 8 | 17:58 | 36.5% | 30.2% | 72.2% | 6.6 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 43.7% | 34.5% | |
| TOTALS | 164 | 4959:40 | 938/2253 | 370/1071 | 278/343 | 2524 | 205/352/557 | 931 | 169 | 92 | 268 | 910/2072 | 184/547 | 427 |
| Avg | 111 | 30:15 | 41.6% | 34.5% | 81.0% | 15.4 | 3.4 | 5.7 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 43.9% | 33.6% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-DET | 9 | 292:28 | 52/142 | 12/62 | 15/23 | 131 | 15/26/41 | 56 | 7 | 5 | 14 | 55/118 | 6/24 | 25 |
| Avg | 9 | 32:30 | 36.6% | 19.4% | 65.2% | 14.6 | 4.6 | 6.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 46.6% | 25.0% | |
| TOTALS | 9 | 292:28 | 52/142 | 12/62 | 15/23 | 131 | 15/26/41 | 56 | 7 | 5 | 14 | 55/118 | 6/24 | 25 |
| Avg | 9 | 32:30 | 36.6% | 19.4% | 65.2% | 14.6 | 4.6 | 6.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 46.6% | 25.0% | |
|