|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #21 out of 55
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #373, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #201 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 652 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-QUE | 53 | 1643:25 | 268/569 | 13/32 | 78/91 | 627 | 72/185/257 | 101 | 49 | 50 | 111 | 293/630 | 51/119 | 155 |
| Avg | | 31:00 | 47.1% | 40.6% | 85.7% | 11.8 | 4.8 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 46.5% | 42.9% | |
| 43-QUE | 53 | 1609:01 | 252/568 | 27/91 | 91/111 | 622 | 85/179/264 | 104 | 68 | 51 | 103 | 275/621 | 45/140 | 167 |
| Avg | 53 | 30:22 | 44.4% | 29.7% | 82.0% | 11.7 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 44.3% | 32.1% | |
| 42-QUE | 46 | 1343:27 | 198/469 | 20/75 | 90/100 | 506 | 73/181/254 | 77 | 28 | 33 | 89 | 241/513 | 28/83 | 129 |
| Avg | 46 | 29:12 | 42.2% | 26.7% | 90.0% | 11.0 | 5.5 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 47.0% | 33.7% | |
| 41-QUE | 6 | 78:10 | 9/26 | 1/4 | 3/6 | 22 | 2/7/9 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 11/27 | 2/9 | 10 |
| Avg | 0 | 13:02 | 34.6% | 25.0% | 50.0% | 3.7 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 40.7% | 22.2% | |
| TOTALS | 158 | 4674:03 | 727/1632 | 61/202 | 262/308 | 1777 | 232/552/784 | 290 | 150 | 138 | 304 | 820/1791 | 126/351 | 461 |
| Avg | 99 | 29:35 | 44.5% | 30.2% | 85.1% | 11.2 | 5.0 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 45.8% | 35.9% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 42-QUE | 6 | 190:57 | 31/66 | 4/12 | 12/14 | 78 | 11/20/31 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 35/80 | 6/15 | 17 |
| Avg | 6 | 31:50 | 47.0% | 33.3% | 85.7% | 13.0 | 5.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 43.8% | 40.0% | |
| TOTALS | 6 | 190:57 | 31/66 | 4/12 | 12/14 | 78 | 11/20/31 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 35/80 | 6/15 | 17 |
| Avg | 6 | 31:50 | 47.0% | 33.3% | 85.7% | 13.0 | 5.2 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 43.8% | 40.0% | |
|