|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #24 out of 62
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #511, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #324 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 600 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 42-NAS | 46 | 947:14 | 140/301 | 16/44 | 62/77 | 358 | 62/104/166 | 89 | 32 | 19 | 44 | 148/346 | 33/94 | 94 |
| Avg | | 20:36 | 46.5% | 36.4% | 80.5% | 7.8 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 42.8% | 35.1% | |
| TOTALS | 46 | 947:14 | 140/301 | 16/44 | 62/77 | 358 | 62/104/166 | 89 | 32 | 19 | 44 | 148/346 | 33/94 | 94 |
| Avg | 0 | 20:36 | 46.5% | 36.4% | 80.5% | 7.8 | 3.6 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 42.8% | 35.1% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 42-NAS | 5 | 85:32 | 13/36 | 2/5 | 5/6 | 33 | 10/6/16 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 28/42 | 10/17 | 10 |
| Avg | | 17:06 | 36.1% | 40.0% | 83.3% | 6.6 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 66.7% | 58.8% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 85:32 | 13/36 | 2/5 | 5/6 | 33 | 10/6/16 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 28/42 | 10/17 | 10 |
| Avg | 0 | 17:06 | 36.1% | 40.0% | 83.3% | 6.6 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 66.7% | 58.8% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 41-NAS | 53 | 1752:11 | 266/639 | 29/109 | 94/118 | 655 | 76/209/285 | 89 | 51 | 29 | 145 | 296/640 | 56/176 | 161 |
| Avg | 53 | 33:04 | 41.6% | 26.6% | 79.7% | 12.4 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 2.7 | 46.3% | 31.8% | |
| TOTALS | 53 | 1752:11 | 266/639 | 29/109 | 94/118 | 655 | 76/209/285 | 89 | 51 | 29 | 145 | 296/640 | 56/176 | 161 |
| Avg | 53 | 33:04 | 41.6% | 26.6% | 79.7% | 12.4 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 46.3% | 31.8% | |
|