|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #32 out of 55
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #300, his statistical rank is #142.
Therefore we believe a salary of 525 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-EDM | 31 | 889:04 | 214/482 | 63/186 | 76/85 | 567 | 32/67/99 | 157 | 16 | 17 | 70 | 127/300 | 27/75 | 70 |
| Avg | | 28:41 | 44.4% | 33.9% | 89.4% | 18.3 | 3.2 | 5.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 42.3% | 36.0% | |
| 43-EDM | 53 | 1457:33 | 200/487 | 65/202 | 81/98 | 546 | 70/132/202 | 281 | 29 | 22 | 76 | 295/608 | 64/171 | 135 |
| Avg | 53 | 27:30 | 41.1% | 32.2% | 82.7% | 10.3 | 3.8 | 5.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 48.5% | 37.4% | |
| 42-EDM | 53 | 1235:15 | 150/413 | 21/79 | 60/71 | 381 | 38/96/134 | 217 | 39 | 19 | 80 | 227/486 | 39/123 | 137 |
| Avg | 53 | 23:18 | 36.3% | 26.6% | 84.5% | 7.2 | 2.5 | 4.1 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 46.7% | 31.7% | |
| 41-EDM | 53 | 879:32 | 125/276 | 21/53 | 63/75 | 334 | 29/76/105 | 159 | 21 | 6 | 53 | 147/329 | 37/87 | 97 |
| Avg | 0 | 16:36 | 45.3% | 39.6% | 84.0% | 6.3 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 44.7% | 42.5% | |
| TOTALS | 190 | 4461:24 | 689/1658 | 170/520 | 280/329 | 1828 | 169/371/540 | 814 | 105 | 64 | 279 | 796/1723 | 167/456 | 439 |
| Avg | 106 | 23:29 | 41.6% | 32.7% | 85.1% | 9.6 | 2.8 | 4.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 46.2% | 36.6% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-EDM | 5 | 133:23 | 15/44 | 5/13 | 6/6 | 41 | 4/6/10 | 29 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 40/90 | 8/28 | 25 |
| Avg | 5 | 26:41 | 34.1% | 38.5% | 100.0% | 8.2 | 2.0 | 5.8 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 2.2 | 44.4% | 28.6% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 133:23 | 15/44 | 5/13 | 6/6 | 41 | 4/6/10 | 29 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 40/90 | 8/28 | 25 |
| Avg | 5 | 26:41 | 34.1% | 38.5% | 100.0% | 8.2 | 2.0 | 5.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 44.4% | 28.6% | |
|