|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #6 out of 55
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #290, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #75 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 1087 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-NOR | 21 | 559:06 | 108/252 | 17/66 | 56/70 | 289 | 23/55/78 | 97 | 15 | 12 | 28 | 118/253 | 23/70 | 39 |
| Avg | | 26:37 | 42.9% | 25.8% | 80.0% | 13.8 | 3.7 | 4.6 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 46.6% | 32.9% | |
| 43-NOR | 53 | 1504:48 | 164/367 | 22/80 | 47/70 | 397 | 58/120/178 | 334 | 45 | 38 | 46 | 270/669 | 57/173 | 128 |
| Avg | 53 | 28:24 | 44.7% | 27.5% | 67.1% | 7.5 | 3.4 | 6.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 40.4% | 32.9% | |
| 42-NOR | 48 | 1138:35 | 77/187 | 11/40 | 42/53 | 207 | 38/96/134 | 236 | 36 | 22 | 23 | 205/497 | 52/143 | 88 |
| Avg | 31 | 23:43 | 41.2% | 27.5% | 79.2% | 4.3 | 2.8 | 4.9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 41.2% | 36.4% | |
| 41-NOR | 53 | 1243:20 | 75/187 | 16/53 | 50/67 | 216 | 44/96/140 | 268 | 46 | 21 | 35 | 219/503 | 38/107 | 115 |
| Avg | 22 | 23:28 | 40.1% | 30.2% | 74.6% | 4.1 | 2.6 | 5.1 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 43.5% | 35.5% | |
| TOTALS | 175 | 4445:49 | 424/993 | 66/239 | 195/260 | 1109 | 163/367/530 | 935 | 142 | 93 | 132 | 812/1922 | 170/493 | 370 |
| Avg | 106 | 25:24 | 42.7% | 27.6% | 75.0% | 6.3 | 3.0 | 5.3 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 42.2% | 34.5% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-NOR | 6 | 177:14 | 13/26 | 1/6 | 1/2 | 28 | 4/15/19 | 40 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 29/78 | 12/44 | 12 |
| Avg | 6 | 29:32 | 50.0% | 16.7% | 50.0% | 4.7 | 3.2 | 6.7 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 37.2% | 27.3% | |
| TOTALS | 6 | 177:14 | 13/26 | 1/6 | 1/2 | 28 | 4/15/19 | 40 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 29/78 | 12/44 | 12 |
| Avg | 6 | 29:32 | 50.0% | 16.7% | 50.0% | 4.7 | 3.2 | 6.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 37.2% | 27.3% | |
|