
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands: Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #9 out of 76 While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #305, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #154 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized. Therefore we believe a salary of 795 is fair. |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
43-SEA | 14 | 491:53 | 40/88 | 2/4 | 6/14 | 88 | 21/49/70 | 122 | 14 | 12 | 10 | 152/287 | 47/110 | 63 |
Avg | 14 | 35:08 | 45.5% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 6.3 | 5.0 | 8.7 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 53.0% | 42.7% | |
TOTALS | 14 | 491:53 | 40/88 | 2/4 | 6/14 | 88 | 21/49/70 | 122 | 14 | 12 | 10 | 152/287 | 47/110 | 63 |
Avg | 14 | 35:08 | 45.5% | 50.0% | 42.9% | 6.3 | 5.0 | 8.7 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 53.0% | 42.7% | |
|
Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
44-VAN | 31 | 980:01 | 139/302 | 2/12 | 46/56 | 326 | 43/118/161 | 66 | 37 | 27 | 30 | 168/373 | 21/65 | 85 |
Avg | 14 | 31:37 | 46.0% | 16.7% | 82.1% | 10.5 | 5.2 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 45.0% | 32.3% | |
43-VAN | 36 | 1142:31 | 144/334 | 12/42 | 46/53 | 346 | 40/102/142 | 96 | 60 | 26 | 46 | 203/430 | 32/97 | 101 |
Avg | 36 | 31:44 | 43.1% | 28.6% | 86.8% | 9.6 | 3.9 | 2.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 47.2% | 33.0% | |
43-SCL | 3 | 105:18 | 13/38 | 0/4 | 0/2 | 26 | 6/10/16 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 28/50 | 7/16 | 13 |
Avg | 3 | 35:06 | 34.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 8.7 | 5.3 | 6.0 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 3.7 | 56.0% | 43.8% | |
42-SCL | 53 | 1797:39 | 180/445 | 25/80 | 61/88 | 446 | 84/194/278 | 183 | 59 | 30 | 67 | 364/756 | 65/194 | 190 |
Avg | 53 | 33:55 | 40.4% | 31.3% | 69.3% | 8.4 | 5.2 | 3.5 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 48.1% | 33.5% | |
TOTALS | 123 | 4025:29 | 476/1119 | 39/138 | 153/199 | 1144 | 173/424/597 | 363 | 160 | 85 | 154 | 763/1609 | 125/372 | 389 |
Avg | 106 | 32:44 | 42.5% | 28.3% | 76.9% | 9.3 | 4.9 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 47.4% | 33.6% | |
|