|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #44 out of 73
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #730, his statistical rank is #156.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 45-SCL | 38 | 1049:12 | 89/197 | 15/33 | 42/46 | 235 | 41/82/123 | 320 | 35 | 24 | 9 | 201/449 | 35/109 | 77 |
| Avg | | 27:37 | 45.2% | 45.5% | 91.3% | 6.2 | 3.2 | 8.4 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 44.8% | 32.1% | |
| 44-SCL | 53 | 1838:19 | 158/306 | 20/45 | 59/77 | 395 | 64/144/208 | 446 | 59 | 22 | 16 | 363/774 | 64/187 | 179 |
| Avg | 53 | 34:41 | 51.6% | 44.4% | 76.6% | 7.5 | 3.9 | 8.4 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 46.9% | 34.2% | |
| 43-SCL | 53 | 825:26 | 61/153 | 7/23 | 40/54 | 169 | 28/82/110 | 187 | 24 | 21 | 10 | 120/298 | 17/68 | 81 |
| Avg | 2 | 15:34 | 39.9% | 30.4% | 74.1% | 3.2 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 40.3% | 25.0% | |
| 42-SCL | 50 | 852:22 | 74/177 | 5/28 | 22/39 | 175 | 37/77/114 | 172 | 24 | 11 | 19 | 172/339 | 43/91 | 71 |
| Avg | 7 | 17:03 | 41.8% | 17.9% | 56.4% | 3.5 | 2.3 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 50.7% | 47.3% | |
| TOTALS | 194 | 4565:19 | 382/833 | 47/129 | 163/216 | 974 | 170/385/555 | 1125 | 142 | 78 | 54 | 856/1860 | 159/455 | 408 |
| Avg | 62 | 23:32 | 45.9% | 36.4% | 75.5% | 5.0 | 2.9 | 5.8 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 46.0% | 34.9% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 44-SCL | 6 | 222:41 | 22/45 | 1/4 | 10/14 | 55 | 9/15/24 | 57 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 30/61 | 12/25 | 12 |
| Avg | 6 | 37:07 | 48.9% | 25.0% | 71.4% | 9.2 | 4.0 | 9.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 49.2% | 48.0% | |
| TOTALS | 6 | 222:41 | 22/45 | 1/4 | 10/14 | 55 | 9/15/24 | 57 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 30/61 | 12/25 | 12 |
| Avg | 6 | 37:07 | 48.9% | 25.0% | 71.4% | 9.2 | 4.0 | 9.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 49.2% | 48.0% | |
|