|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #74 out of 76
While we measure his overall skills to be ranked #451, his statistical rank is #386.
Therefore we believe a salary of 500 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 46-TAM | 30 | 467:54 | 113/220 | 24/52 | 58/67 | 308 | 15/36/51 | 95 | 11 | 8 | 20 | 73/162 | 9/34 | 46 |
| Avg | | 15:36 | 51.4% | 46.2% | 86.6% | 10.3 | 1.7 | 3.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 45.1% | 26.5% | |
| 45-TAM | 53 | 633:45 | 113/252 | 15/63 | 53/65 | 294 | 22/51/73 | 116 | 20 | 1 | 35 | 124/241 | 26/52 | 61 |
| Avg | 0 | 11:57 | 44.8% | 23.8% | 81.5% | 5.5 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 51.5% | 50.0% | |
| 44-TAM | 53 | 1573:32 | 239/523 | 39/118 | 82/99 | 599 | 48/117/165 | 320 | 42 | 10 | 62 | 289/601 | 65/148 | 196 |
| Avg | 53 | 29:41 | 45.7% | 33.1% | 82.8% | 11.3 | 3.1 | 6.0 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 48.1% | 43.9% | |
| 43-EDM | 53 | 1091:27 | 140/351 | 24/85 | 85/108 | 389 | 37/92/129 | 212 | 20 | 4 | 64 | 192/392 | 40/99 | 143 |
| Avg | 0 | 20:36 | 39.9% | 28.2% | 78.7% | 7.3 | 2.4 | 4.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 49.0% | 40.4% | |
| TOTALS | 189 | 3766:38 | 605/1346 | 102/318 | 278/339 | 1590 | 122/296/418 | 743 | 93 | 23 | 181 | 678/1396 | 140/333 | 446 |
| Avg | 53 | 19:56 | 44.9% | 32.1% | 82.0% | 8.4 | 2.2 | 3.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 48.6% | 42.0% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 43-EDM | 5 | 106:37 | 6/13 | 2/6 | 2/2 | 16 | 1/7/8 | 27 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 33/59 | 10/25 | 13 |
| Avg | 0 | 21:19 | 46.2% | 33.3% | 100.0% | 3.2 | 1.6 | 5.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 55.9% | 40.0% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 106:37 | 6/13 | 2/6 | 2/2 | 16 | 1/7/8 | 27 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 33/59 | 10/25 | 13 |
| Avg | 0 | 21:19 | 46.2% | 33.3% | 100.0% | 3.2 | 1.6 | 5.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 55.9% | 40.0% | |
|