|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #9 out of 53
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #335, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #99 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 780 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 46-TAM | 30 | 1091:14 | 153/387 | 59/179 | 56/81 | 421 | 59/131/190 | 112 | 19 | 28 | 63 | 208/438 | 31/103 | 104 |
| Avg | | 36:22 | 39.5% | 33.0% | 69.1% | 14.0 | 6.3 | 3.7 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 47.5% | 30.1% | |
| 45-TAM | 53 | 1893:20 | 245/571 | 89/267 | 93/130 | 672 | 99/208/307 | 158 | 51 | 52 | 88 | 406/801 | 76/204 | 207 |
| Avg | 53 | 35:43 | 42.9% | 33.3% | 71.5% | 12.7 | 5.8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 50.7% | 37.3% | |
| 44-TAM | 53 | 1701:44 | 208/525 | 72/248 | 79/110 | 567 | 81/185/266 | 153 | 53 | 23 | 109 | 352/694 | 59/162 | 189 |
| Avg | 53 | 32:06 | 39.6% | 29.0% | 71.8% | 10.7 | 5.0 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 50.7% | 36.4% | |
| TOTALS | 136 | 4686:18 | 606/1483 | 220/694 | 228/321 | 1660 | 239/524/763 | 423 | 123 | 103 | 260 | 966/1933 | 166/469 | 500 |
| Avg | 106 | 34:27 | 40.9% | 31.7% | 71.0% | 12.2 | 5.6 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.9 | 50.0% | 35.4% | |
|