|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #11 out of 75
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #660, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #234 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 750 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 46-NO | 46 | 610:16 | 37/91 | 13/36 | 11/12 | 98 | 54/139/193 | 36 | 12 | 17 | 13 | 45/99 | 4/21 | 36 |
| Avg | | 13:16 | 40.7% | 36.1% | 91.7% | 2.1 | 4.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 45.5% | 19.0% | |
| 45-NO | 45 | 642:36 | 36/103 | 12/38 | 8/11 | 92 | 48/136/184 | 28 | 17 | 16 | 14 | 81/155 | 18/36 | 36 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:17 | 35.0% | 31.6% | 72.7% | 2.0 | 4.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 52.3% | 50.0% | |
| TOTALS | 91 | 1252:52 | 73/194 | 25/74 | 19/23 | 190 | 102/275/377 | 64 | 29 | 33 | 27 | 126/254 | 22/57 | 72 |
| Avg | 0 | 13:46 | 37.6% | 33.8% | 82.6% | 2.1 | 4.1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 49.6% | 38.6% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 45-NO | 7 | 91:46 | 7/17 | 4/9 | 2/2 | 20 | 6/16/22 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10/15 | 0/0 | 6 |
| Avg | 0 | 13:07 | 41.2% | 44.4% | 100.0% | 2.9 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 66.7% | | |
| TOTALS | 7 | 91:46 | 7/17 | 4/9 | 2/2 | 20 | 6/16/22 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10/15 | 0/0 | 6 |
| Avg | 0 | 13:07 | 41.2% | 44.4% | 100.0% | 2.9 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 66.7% | | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 45-DET | 1 | 33:40 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 3 | 2/5/7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3/13 | 0/0 | 3 |
| Avg | 1 | 33:40 | 100.0% | 100.0% | | 3.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 23.1% | | |
| TOTALS | 1 | 33:40 | 1/1 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 3 | 2/5/7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3/13 | 0/0 | 3 |
| Avg | 1 | 33:40 | | 100.0% | | 3.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 23.1% | | |
|