|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My agent is leveraging a new formula to help determine my salary demands:
Amongst eligible players from his draft class, he is ranked #15 out of 72
While we measure his overall statistical rank to be #369, our measurement of his skills are are ranked #131 which makes us feel he is being under-utilized.
Therefore we believe a salary of 690 is fair. |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 45-MIA | 5 | 71:01 | 22/45 | 2/6 | 12/14 | 58 | 5/5/10 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 24/39 | 7/17 | 8 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:12 | 48.9% | 33.3% | 85.7% | 11.6 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 61.5% | 41.2% | |
| TOTALS | 5 | 71:01 | 22/45 | 2/6 | 12/14 | 58 | 5/5/10 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 24/39 | 7/17 | 8 |
| Avg | 0 | 14:12 | 48.9% | 33.3% | 85.7% | 11.6 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 61.5% | 41.2% | |
|
| Season | GP | MIN | FGM-A | 3PT | FT | PTS | REB(O/D/T) | AST | STL | BLK | TO | DFG | D3PT | PF |
| 47-NAS | 36 | 1190:13 | 181/435 | 18/73 | 41/57 | 421 | 99/196/295 | 72 | 47 | 63 | 84 | 186/425 | 27/80 | 91 |
| Avg | 0 | 33:04 | 41.6% | 24.7% | 71.9% | 11.7 | 8.2 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 43.8% | 33.8% | |
| 46-NAS | 18 | 608:47 | 99/239 | 16/40 | 19/28 | 233 | 46/113/159 | 34 | 22 | 32 | 38 | 86/207 | 14/44 | 37 |
| Avg | 18 | 33:49 | 41.4% | 40.0% | 67.9% | 12.9 | 8.8 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 41.5% | 31.8% | |
| TOTALS | 54 | 1799:00 | 280/674 | 34/113 | 60/85 | 654 | 145/309/454 | 106 | 69 | 95 | 122 | 272/632 | 41/124 | 128 |
| Avg | 18 | 33:19 | 41.5% | 30.1% | 70.6% | 12.1 | 8.4 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 43.0% | 33.1% | |
|